?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부

 

Jangho Kim, Deok-Ho Kim, Ki Taek Lim, Hoon Seonwoo, Soo Hyun Park, Yang-Rae Kim, Yeonju Kim, Yun-Hoon Choung, Pill-Hoon Choung*, Jong Hoon Chung*

 

Tissue Engineering, Part C: Methods 2012, 18(12), 913−923

 

[Cover art]
Publication online: July 16, 2012
Publication date: November 6, 2012
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0731
ISSN: 2152-4947
Journal country: United States
Publisher: MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
URL: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0731
 

Abstract: In this article, we describe the design and manipulation of charged nanomatrices and their application as efficient platforms for modulating cell behaviors. Using electrospraying technology and well designed biomaterials, poly(ɛ-caprolactone; PCL) and polyethylenimine, the negatively charged PCL nanomatrix (nPCL nanomatrix) and the positively charged PCL nanomatrix (pPCL nanomatrix) were fabricated. It was demonstrated that cell adhesion, affinity, and shape were sensitively modulated in negatively and positively charged nanomatrices. Our results showed that the pPCL nanomatrix promoted adhesion of NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells as compared to the nPCL nanomatrix. When fluid shear stress was applied, cell affinity on the pPCL nanomatrix increased even more. NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells adopted a relatively spherical shape on the pPCL nanomatrix while adopting an aligned, narrow shape on the nPCL nanomatrix. It was also found that charged nanomatrices influenced the cross-sectional cell shape. The cross-sectional cell shape on the pPCL nanomatrix was extremely flattened, whereas the cross-sectional cell shape was relatively round on the nPCL nanomatrix and some of the adhered cells floated. We also showed that the surfaces of the nPCL and pPCL nanomatrices adsorbed the different serum proteins. These results collectively demonstrated a combination of environmental factors including nanoscale structure, electrostatic forces, and absorption of biomolecules on charged substrates affected cell response in terms of cellular adhesion and shape.

 

Download: 15_Tissue Engineering Part C.pdf


  1. 30. Nanoscale electrocatalysis of hydrazine electro-oxidation at blistered graphite electrodes, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8(44), 30458–30466

  2. 29. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy at well controlled dc bias for nanoporous platinum microelectrode in embryo brain, ChemElectroChem 2016, 3(12), 2189−2195

  3. 28. Light-guided electrodeposition of non-noble catalyst patterns for photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution, Energy and Environmental Science 2015, 8(12), 3654−3662

  4. 27. Impact of surface chemistry on nanoparticle-electrode interactions in the electrochemical detection of nanoparticle collisions, Langmuir 2015, 31(43), 11932−11942

  5. 26. Time-resolved detection and analysis of single nanoparticle electrocatalytic impacts, Journal of the American Chemical Society 2015, 137(34), 10902−10905

  6. 25. Nucleation and aggregative growth of palladium nanoparticles on carbon electrodes: experiment and kinetic model, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2015, 119(30), 17389−17397

  7. 24. Redox-dependent spatially resolved electrochemistry at graphene and graphite step edges, ACS Nano 2015, 9(4), 3558−3571

  8. 23. Surface coverage and size effects on electrochemical oxidation of uniform gold nanoparticles, Electrochemistry Communications 2015, 53(1), 11−14

  9. 22. Electrochemical signal amplification for immunosensor based on 3D interdigitated array electrodes, Analytical Chemistry 2014, 86(12), 5991−5998

  10. 21. Tunable decoration of reduced graphene oxide with Au nanoparticles for the oxygen reduction reaction, Advanced Functional Materials 2014, 24(19), 2764−2771

  11. 20. Modulation of quinone PCET reaction by Ca2+ ion captured by calix[4]quinone in water, Journal of the American Chemical Society 2013, 135(50), 18957−18967

  12. 19. Electrokinetic concentration on a microfluidic chip using polyelectrolytic gel plugs for small molecule immunoassay, Electrochimica Acta 2013, 110(1), 164−171

  13. 18. Enhanced electrochemical reactions of 1,4-benzoquinone at nanoporous electrodes, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2013, 15(26), 10645−10653

  14. 17. Immunosensor based on electrogenerated chemiluminescence using Ru(bpy)32+-doped silica nanoparticles and calix[4]crown-5 self-assembled monolayers, Electroanalysis 2013, 25(4), 1056−1063

  15. 16. Graphene-incorporated chitosan substrata for adhesion and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells, Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2013, 1(7), 933−938

  16. 15. Charged nanomatrices as efficient platforms for modulating cell adhesion and shape, Tissue Engineering, Part C: Methods 2012, 18(12), 913−923

  17. 14. A BODIPY-functionalized bimetallic probe for sensitive and selective color-fluorometric chemosensing of Hg2+, Analyst 2012, 137(17), 3914−3916

  18. 13. In-channel electrochemical detection in the middle of microchannel under high electric field, Analytical Chemistry 2012, 84(2), 901−907

  19. 12. Gold microshell tip for in situ electrochemical raman spectroscopy, Advanced Materials 2012, 24(3), 421−424

  20. 11. Synthesis of a graphene–carbon nanotube composite and its electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide, Electrochimica Acta 2012, 59(1), 509−514

Board Pagination Prev 1 2 Next
/ 2

로그인

로그인폼

로그인 유지